Corporations
FARMERS AUTOMOBILE INTER-INSURANCE EXCHANGE (a Corporation), Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SACRAMENTO COUNTY et al., Respondents
127 Cal. App. 780·District Court of Appeal of the State of California·1932·CA
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
[Civ. No. 4814.
Third Appellate District.
November 17, 1932.]
FARMERS AUTOMOBILE INTER-INSURANCE EXCHANGE (a Corporation), Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SACRAMENTO COUNTY et al., Respondents.
Humphrey, Searls, Doyle & MacMillan, Butler Van Dyke, Desmond & Harris and Thomas B. Deeper for Petitioner.
A. B. Reynolds, Ralph H. Lewis and George E. MeCutchen for Respondents.
[MAJORITY — THOMPSON (R. L.), J.]
THOMPSON (R. L.), J.
This petition for a writ of prohibition involves the same issues which are presented in a petition for writ of supersedeas entitled Field v. Hughes, (Cal. App.) 16 Pac. (2d) 160, in which an opinion of this court was this day filed. It therefore becomes uniiecessary to pass upon this petition for a writ of prohibition.
The petition is therefore dismissed.
Pullen, P. J., and Plummer, J., concurred.