General

Emma F. Heidrich, Appellant, v. The Rochester and Suburban Railway Company, Respondent

114 A.D. 906·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1906·NY

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

Emma F. Heidrich, Appellant, v. The Rochester and Suburban Railway Company, Respondent. Order modified by requiring as a condition of granting the defendant’s motion for a new trial, the payment by it of the trial fee and disbursements of the former trial; and as so modified affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. [MAJORITY] All concurred, except Kruse, J., who dissented and voted for reversal.