General

In the Matter of Carl D. Wells, Petitioner, v. Jill Konviser et al., Respondents

138 A.D.3d 50128 N.Y.S.3d 307·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·2016·NY

Concur — Friedman, J.P., Sweeny, Saxe, Richter and Kahn, JJ.

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

In the Matter of Carl D. Wells, Petitioner, v Jill Konviser et al., Respondents. [28 NYS3d 307] [MAJORITY] The above-named petitioner having presented an application to this Court praying for an order, pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules, now, upon reading and filing the papers in said proceeding, and due deliberation having been had thereon, it is unanimously ordered that the application be and the same hereby is denied and the petition dismissed, without costs or disbursements. Concur — Friedman, J.P., Sweeny, Saxe, Richter and Kahn, JJ.