Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Corporations
The James McCreery Realty Corporation, Plaintiff in Error, v. The Equitable National Bank
203 U.S. 584·Supreme Court of the United States·1906
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 109.
The James McCreery Realty Corporation, Plaintiff in Error, v. The Equitable National Bank.
Submitted November 16, 1906.
Decided November 19, 1906.
Mr. Eugene C. Kremer for plaintiff in error. Mr. Charles A.. Hess for defendant in error.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
In error to the City Court of the city of New York.
Per Curiam.
Judgment affirmed with costs. Dower v. Richards, 151 U. S. 658; McCormick v. Market National Bank, 165 U. S. 538; California National Bank v. Kennedy, 167 U. S. 367.