General
Protest 279189-G of Saks & Co. (New York)
2 Cust. Ct. 756·United States Customs Court·1939
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 41621.
Protest 279189-G of Saks & Co. (New York).
[MAJORITY — Dallinger, J.]
Opinion by
Dallinger, J.
In accordance with stipulation of counsel photo frames, atomizers, boxes, caskets, and corks chiefly used in the household for utilitarian purposes were held dutiable as household utensils at 40 percent under paragraph 339. United States v. Friedlaender (21 C. C. P. A. 103, T. D. 46445), Dow v. United States (id. 282, T. D. 46816), Rice v. United States (T. D. 49373), and Woolworth v. United States (T. D. 47857) cited. Toilet sets similar to those the subject of Abstract 8950 were held separately dutiable as brushes at 45 percent under paragraph 1407 and mirrors at 50 percent under paragraph 230.