General

Estelle Kelley, Respondent, v. Roland Lord O'Brian and Others, Individually and Doing Business under the Assumed Name and Style of O'Brian, Potter & Co., and John T. Noye, Appellants

262 A.D. 800·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1941·NY

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

Estelle Kelley, Respondent, v. Roland Lord O’Brian and Others, Individually and Doing Business under the Assumed Name and Style of O’Brian, Potter & Co., and John T. Noye, Appellants. [MAJORITY] Order, so far as appealed from, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. All concur. (The portion of the order appealed from grants an examination of defendants before trial in an action to recover damages for the alleged breach of duty by defendants in the purchase and sale of stock on plaintiff’s account.) Present — Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Taylor, Dowling and McCurn, JJ.