Torts · MBE-tested
Rose Weylard, Respondent, v. William H. Kirchner, Appellant; Emil Weylard, Respondent, v. William H. Kirchner, Appellant
170 A.D. 961·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1915·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Rose Weylard, Respondent, v. William H. Kirchner, Appellant. Emil Weylard, Respondent, v. William H. Kirchner, Appellant.
Appeals from judgments of the County Court; Bronx county, entered in the Bronx county clerk’s office on the 26th day of February, 1915, upon verdicts, and also from orders entered on the 6th day of March, 1915, denying motions for new trial.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam :]
Per Curiam :
The judgment and order in each ease are reversed, with costs, on the ground that there was no evidence to sustain thejfinding of the jury that the defendant was guilty of negligence, and that finding is reversed and the complaint dismissed, with costs. Present—Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ. In each case judgment and order reversed, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs.