Corporations

Jack A. Kaufman, Appellant, v. Goldman Stores Corporation, Respondent

252 A.D. 666·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1937·NY

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

Jack A. Kaufman, Appellant, v. Goldman Stores Corporation, Respondent. First Department, December 23, 1937. Maurice Knapp of counsel [Murray C. Spett and Ralph H. Wiener with him on the brief; Weisman, Quinn, Allan & Spett, attorneys], for the appellant. Arthur A. McGivney of counsel [Walter T. Stern with bim on the brief; Stern & McGivney, attorneys], for the respondent. Affg. 161 Mise. 773. [MAJORITY — Per Curiam.] Per Curiam. The determination of the Appellate Term should be affirmed, with costs, on the ground that the facts adduced in this record clearly show that the acts of the employee constituted an acceptance by him of the termination of the alleged oral employment agreement. Present — Martin, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ. Determination unanimously affirmed, with costs and disbursements.