Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Civil Procedure · MBE-tested
BRANDEIS v. ALLEN, Collector; SAME v. UNITED STATES
22 F.2d 415·United States District Court for the District of Nebraska·1927
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
BRANDEIS v. ALLEN, Collector. SAME v. UNITED STATES.
District Court, D. Nebraska, Omaha Division.
July 15, 1927.
Nos. 2082, 2083.
Internal revenue <@=7(8) — 'Widow’s annuity under deceased husband’s will, in lieu of statutory rights in estate, held not taxable as “income.”
Annuity given to widow by husband’s will, in lieu of her statutory rights in bis property to which she was entitled as a widow, should be deemed to have been purchased by her relinquishment of her statutory rights, and was not taxable as “income.”
[Ed. Note. — For other definitions, see Words and Phrases, First and Second Series, Income.]
At Law. Actions by Mrs. Arthur D. Brandéis against Arthur B. Allen, Collector, of the United States, and against the United States. On demurrer to petition.
Demurrer overruled, and exception to such ruling allowed.
John L. Kennedy, of Omaha, Neb., for plaintiff.
James C. Kinsler, U. S. Atty., of Omaha, Neb.
[MAJORITY — WOODBOUGH, District Judge.]
WOODBOUGH, District Judge.
The plaintiff accepted and is in receipt of an annuity given her by the will of her deceased husband, in lieu of the statutory rights in his property to which she was entitled as a widow. Upon protest she has paid an income tax on her annuity receipts from 1920 to 1924, inclusive, which she now sues to recover back. Her claim is that hor annuity should be deemed to have been purchased by her relinquishment of her statutory rights as widow, and therefore such annuity is not income.
I am of opinion that the decision of the Circuit Court of Appeals in the Second Circuit in Warner v. Walsh, 15 F.(2d)367, is determinative of the question in favor of the plaintiff. Plaintiff’s annuity should be deemed to have been bought and paid for by hor relinquishment to the estate of hor statutory right as widow, and her annual receipts did not come to her as income, and therefore are not taxable as income.
It is ordered that the demurrer of the government bo overruled, to which defendant duly excepts, and the exception is allowed.