General
INTERNATIONAL RY. CO. v. CRAWFORD
254 F. 989·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1918
Before WARD, ROGERS, and MANTON, Circuit Judges.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
INTERNATIONAL RY. CO. v. CRAWFORD.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
November 13, 1918.)
No. 38.
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Western District of New York. Action between the International Railway Company and Alice Crawford. There was a .-judgment for the latter, and the former brings error.
Affirmed.
Cohn, Ghormann & Franchot, of Niagara Falls, N. X. (Edward J. Franchot, of Niagara Falls, N. X., of counsel), for plaintiff in error.
Bartlett & Roberts, of Buffalo, N. X. (Eugene M. Bartlett, of Buffalo, N. X., of counsel), for defendant in error.
Before WARD, ROGERS, and MANTON, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Judgment affirmed.