General
M. KANANACK & CO., Inc., Meyer Kananack and Irving Kananack, Plaintiffs in Error, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant in Error
11 F.2d 1013·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1926
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
M. KANANACK & CO., Inc., Meyer Kananack and Irving Kananack, Plaintiffs in Error, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant in Error.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
March 15, 1926.)
No. 196.
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.
John B. Johnston, of New York City (Vine H. Smith and Lazarus Joseph, both of New York City, of counsel, and Jacob S. Demov, of New York City, on the brief), for plaintiffs in error.
Emory R. Buckner, U. S. Atty., of New York City (David P. Siegel, William J. Millard, and Raphael Koenig, Asst. U. S. Attys., all of New York City, of counsel), for the United States.
Before ROGERS, HOUGH, and MANTON, Circuit Judges.
Certiorari denied 46 S. Ct. 633, 70 L. Ed. —.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Judgment affirmed.