General
Brooklyn Hills Improvement Company, Appellant, v. New York and Rockaway Beach Railway Company, Respondent
178 N.Y. 593·New York Court of Appeals·1904·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Brooklyn Hills Improvement Company, Appellant, v. New York and Rockaway Beach Railway Company, Respondent.
Brooklyn Bills Impr. Go. v. N. T. & R. B. By. Go., 80 App. Dtv. 508, affirmed.
(Argued March 29, 1904;
decided April 26, 1904.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered April 6‘, 1903, affirming a judgment for costs in favor of defendant, entered upon a verdict for» nominal damages in favor of plaintiff, and an order denying a motion for a new trial.
John II. Corwin for appellant.
Edward M. Shepard, Joseph F. Kearny and William J. Kelly for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Gray, Bartlett, Haight, Martin, Vann and Werner, JJ. Not voting: Parker, Ch. J.