Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Corporations
E. FOUGERA & CO., Inc., a Corporation Duly Organized and Existing under and by Virtue of the Laws of the State of New York, Owner and Claimant of Eleven Dozen Cartons, More or Less of an Article of Drug Labeled in Part "Vapex," Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee
63 F.2d 1000·United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·1933
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
E. FOUGERA & CO., Inc., a Corporation Duly Organized and Existing under and by Virtue of the Laws of the State of New York, Owner and Claimant of Eleven Dozen Cartons, More or Less of an Article of Drug Labeled in Part “Vapex,” Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
No. 3427.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Jan. 14, 1933.
See, also, 59 F.(2d) 446.
Hinkley, Hisky & Burger, of Baltimore, Md., and Walter L. Post, of New York City, for the appellant.
Simon E. Sobeloff, U. S. Atty., of Baltimore, Md.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Case dismissed under Rule 20 by agreement of counsel.