Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
Augustus Van Keuren et al., Respondents, v. William Starr Miller, Appellant
144 N.Y. 636·New York Court of Appeals·1894·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Augustus Van Keuren et al., Respondents, v. William Starr Miller, Appellant.
(Argued October 30, 1894;
decided November 27, 1894.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered upon an order made July 28,1893, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered noon a decision of .the court on trial at Special Term.
Esselsiyn c& MeOarty for appellant.
A. Lee Wager for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm, with costs and five per cent damages under section 3251 of Code of Civil Procedure; no opinion.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed._