General
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Jack Hsu, Appellant
97 A.D.3d 603947 N.Y.S.2d 333·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·2012·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jack Hsu, Appellant.
[947 NYS2d 333]
[MAJORITY]
Since the defendant had not yet completed serving his originally imposed determinate sentence of imprisonment when he was resentenced, his resentencing to a term including the statutorily required period of postrelease supervision in addition to the determinate term of imprisonment previously imposed did not subject him to double jeopardy (see People v Lingle, 16 NY3d 621, 630-632 [2011]; People v Jones, 94 AD3d 1146 [2012]; People v Battle, 94 AD3d 1014 [2012]).
The defendant’s remaining contention is without merit. Florio, J.P., Balkin, Hall and Miller, JJ., concur.