Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
The Grocers' Bank of the City of New York, Appellant, v. William Fitch, Respondent
58 N.Y. 623·New York Court of Appeals·1874·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The Grocers’ Bank of the City of New York, Appellant, v. William Fitch, Respondent.
(Argued June 1, 1874;
decided June 9, 1874.)
J. M. Guiteau for the appellant.
E. A. Doolittle for the respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm on opinion of Brady, J., in court below. All concur.
Order affirmed.'