Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Bankruptcy
George A. HILL et al., Trustees, Petitioners. In the Matter of CASS & DALEY SHOE COMPANY, Bankrupt
16 F.2d 1015·United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit·1926
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
George A. HILL et al., Trustees, Petitioners. In the Matter of CASS & DALEY SHOE COMPANY, Bankrupt.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, First Circuit.
December 31, 1926.)
No. 2020 (Original).
See, also, 11 F.(2d) 872.
Alexander G. Gould and Thomas M. Yin-son, both of Boston, Mass., for petitioners.
Alfred P. Lowell, of Boston, Mass. (S. H. Pillsbury and Pillsbury, Dana & Young, all of Boston, Mass., on the brief), for respondent.
Before BINGHAM, JOHNSON, and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
This is a petition to revise in matter of law, under section 24b of the Bankruptcy Act (Comp. St. § 9608), a decree of the District Court of the United States for the District of Massachusetts vacating an order of the referee that the Old Colony Trust Company deliver to the trustee in bankruptcy of the Case & Daley Company certain funds and stock.
We have carefully examined the opinion of Judge Brewster, who entered the decree, and which has been published in 13 F.(2d) 930. Its reasoning and the result reached are satisfactory, and we adopt the same as the opinion of this court.
The decree of the District Court is affirmed, with costs in this court to the respondent.