Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
Public Service Commission (State Division of the Department of Public Service of New York) et al. v. United States et al.
323 U.S. 675·Supreme Court of the United States·1944
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 479.
Public Service Commission (State Division of the Department of Public Service of New York) et al. v. United States et al.
November 13, 1944.
Messrs. John J. Broderick, Philip Halpern, and Horace M. Gray for appellants.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
On remand of the case of City of Yonkers v. United States, 320 U. S. 685, to the Interstate Commerce Commission for further findings, the Commission reopened the case, took further evidence, and made additional findings. Upon examination of the case now here on appeal we conclude that those findings are sufficient to support the order, and the evidence is sufficient to support the findings. The judgment is affirmed.