Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Tax
The People of the State of New York ex rel. Consolidated Ginseng Company of America, Respondent, v. Otto Kelsey, as Comptroller of the State of New York, Appellant
182 N.Y. 526·New York Court of Appeals·1905·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The People of the State of New York ex rel. Consolidated Ginseng Company of America, Respondent, v. Otto Kelsey, as Comptroller of the State of New York, Appellant.
(Argued June 2, 1905;
decided June 16, 1905.)
People ex rel. Consolidated Ginseng Co. v. Kelsey,105 App. Div. 175, affirmed.
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered May 11,1905, which modified and affirmed as modified a determination of the defendant assessing a license tax upon the relator.
Julius M. Mayer, Attorney-General, for apjiellant.
Charles W. Tooke for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Gray, O’Brien, Bartlett and Werner, JJ. Dissenting: Cullen, Ch. J., Haight and Yann, JJ.