Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Criminal Law · MBE-tested
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Albert T. Patrick, Appellant
183 N.Y. 537·New York Court of Appeals·1905·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Albert T. Patrick, Appellant.
(Argued November 20, 1905;
decided November 28, 1905.)
[MAJORITY]
Motion to amend remittitur, by inserting therein a recital that upon appeal to the Court of Appeals defendant challenged his conviction for murder as being in violation of certain provisions of the Federal Constitution and that by its decision said court overruled such contention, denied. (See 182 N. Y. 131.)
Concur: Cullen, Oh. J., G-ray, Bartlett, Haight, Vann and Werner, JJ. Dissenting: O’Brien, J.