Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
MASCUILLI, ADMINISTRATRIX v. UNITED STATES
387 U.S. 237·Supreme Court of the United States·1967
Mr. Justice Harlan, Mr. Justice Stewart, and Mr. Justice White are of the opinion that certiorari should be denied.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
MASCUILLI, ADMINISTRATRIX v. UNITED STATES.
No. 274.
Decided May 22, 1967.
Abraham E. Freedman, Milton M. Borowsky and Martin J. Vigderman for petitioner.
Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Douglas and Alan S. Rosenthal for the United States.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment is reversed. Mahnich v. Southern S. S. Co., 321 U. S. 96; Crumady v. The Joachim Hendrik Fisser, 358 U. S. 423.
Mr. Justice Harlan, Mr. Justice Stewart, and Mr. Justice White are of the opinion that certiorari should be denied.