Corporations
KATIE N. STEPHENS et al., Respondents, v. THE LEMOORE CANAL & IRRIGATION COMPANY, Defendant and Appellant; EMMA E. McKENNA, Executrix of the Last Will of Richard E. McKenna, Deceased, Intervener and Respondent
22 Cal. App. 809·District Court of Appeal of the State of California·1913·CA
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
[Civ. No. 1125.
Third Appellate District.
August 16, 1913.]
KATIE N. STEPHENS et al., Respondents, v. THE LEMOORE CANAL & IRRIGATION COMPANY, Defendant and Appellant; EMMA E. McKENNA, Executrix of the Last Will of Richard E. McKenna, Deceased, Intervener and Respondent.
Corporation—Sale op Stock por Delinquent Assessments.—Judgment and order affirmed on the authority of Stephens v. Lemoore Canal Irrigation Co., ante, p. 579.
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Kings County and from an order refusing a new trial. John G. Covert, Judge.
Houghton & Houghton, for Appellant.
Miles Wallace, and E. T. Cosper, for Respondents.
M. L. Short, and H. Scott Jacobs, for Intervener and Respondent.
[MAJORITY — CHIPMAN, P. J.]
CHIPMAN, P. J.
This appeal is by the defendant company and was referred to in our opinion in the same case No. 1113, Stephens v. Lemoore Land & Irrigation Co., ante, p. 579, [135 Pac. 707], this day decided. The questions here presented are the same as were considered and decided in No. 1113 and, for the reason there given, the judgment and order are affirmed.
Burnett, J., and Hart, J., concurred.