Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
Henry H. Jackson et al., as Executors and Trustees under the Will of Peter A. H. Jackson, Appellants, v. Mary E. Rowe, Respondent
191 N.Y. 512·New York Court of Appeals·1908·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Henry H. Jackson et al., as Executors and Trustees under the Will of Peter A. H. Jackson, Appellants, v. Mary E. Rowe, Respondent.
Jackson v. Howe, 106 App. Div. 65, 614, affirmed.
(Argued January 23, 1908;
decided February 18, 1908.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered July 12, 1905, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term and an order denying a motion for a new trial in an action to determine conflicting claims to real property.
John L. Wells for appellants.
Frederick B. Woodruff George S. Bixby for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Haight, Vann, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ. .....