Criminal Law · MBE-tested

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Carlos Paulino, Appellant

284 A.D.2d 350725 N.Y.S.2d 886·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·2001·NY

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Carlos Paulino, Appellant. [725 NYS2d 886] [MAJORITY] —Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rios, J.), rendered September 16, 1999, convicting him of burglary in the second degree and grand larceny in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed. The defendant’s contention that he was deprived of a fair trial by the manner in which the court marshaled the evidence during its charge is not preserved for appellate review since no objection was made to the charge on that ground (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Bacchus, 183 AD2d 720; People v McDonald, 144 AD2d 701). Goldstein, J. P., McGinity, Schmidt and Smith, JJ., concur.