General
Meyer Buchman, Respondent, v. Theodore Prince and Others, Copartners Doing Business under the Firm Name and Style of Theodore Prince & Company, Appellants
234 A.D. 866·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1931·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Meyer Buchman, Respondent, v. Theodore Prince and Others, Copartners Doing Business under the Firm Name and Style of Theodore Prince & Company, Appellants.
[MAJORITY]
Order denying motion to dismiss complaint affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, defendants to have twenty days from service of a copy of the order herein within which to answer the complaint. We refrain at this time from a determination whether the so-called former action involving the counterclaim of the plaintiff’s mother is res judicata as to the plaintiff’s present suit. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Hagarty and Tompkins, JJ., concur.