General

In the Matter of the Applications of Vincent O'Connell (2) and Others, Appellants, for Peremptory Orders of Mandamus Directed to Mortimer Gold, as Treasurer of the City of Long Beach, and Others, Respondents

243 A.D. 803·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1935·NY

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

In the Matter of the Applications of Vincent O’Connell (2) and Others, Appellants, for Peremptory Orders of Mandamus Directed to Mortimer Gold, as Treasurer of the City of Long Beach, and Others, Respondents. [MAJORITY] In view of the decision of the appeal (Matter of O’Connell v. Gold, post, p. 812), decided herewith, the motion for a stay pending the determination of said appeal is dismissed. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagerty, Tompkins, Davis and Johnston, JJ.