General
John Bernunzio, Appellant, v. William T. Plumb and Another, Ancillary Receivers of New York State Railways, Respondents
242 A.D. 673·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1934·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
John Bernunzio, Appellant, v. William T. Plumb and Another, Ancillary Receivers of New York State Railways, Respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Taylor, J., who dissents and votes for reversal on the law and for granting a new trial on the authority of Lehr v. S. & H. P. R. R. Co. (118 N. Y. 556); Knaisch v. Joline (138 App. Div. 854); Byan v. Brooklyn City R. Co. (216 id. 732); Morey v. N. Y. C. R. R. Co. (234 id. 210; affd., 260 N. Y. 691).