Criminal Law · MBE-tested

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Joseph Dodge, Also Known as Joseph Hunt, Appellant

260 A.D.2d 503686 N.Y.S.2d 732·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1999·NY

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Joseph Dodge, Also Known as Joseph Hunt, Appellant. [686 NYS2d 732] [MAJORITY] —Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Cacciabaudo, J.), rendered January 25, 1995, convicting him of attempted burglary in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed. Mere eligibility for youthful offender status does not mandate youthful offender treatment. The decision to grant such treatment lies wholly within the discretion of the court (see, CPL 720.20; People v Wallace, 246 AD2d 676; People v Vera, 206 AD2d 494; People v Barr, 168 AD2d 625). The sentencing court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the defendant youthful offender status. Mangano, P. J., Santucci, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur.