General
John Patrick HALFPENNY, Esq., Petitioner v. PHILADELPHIA COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, FAMILY LAW DIVISION, the Hon. Lisette Shirdan-Harris, Mary Bosart Halfpenny, Esq., and Cozen O'Connor L.L.C., Respondents
29 A.3d 760·Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·2011·PA
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
John Patrick HALFPENNY, Esq., Petitioner v. PHILADELPHIA COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, FAMILY LAW DIVISION, the Hon. Lisette Shirdan-Harris, Mary Bosart Halfpenny, Esq., and Cozen O’Connor L.L.C., Respondents.
No. 25 EM 2011.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Sept. 26, 2011.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
And now this 26th day of September, 2011, the Application for Leave to File Original Process is GRANTED, and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus is DENIED. The Prothonotary is directed to strike the name of the jurist from the caption.