General
ROYAL TRUST CO. et al. v. WASHBURN, B. & I. R. RY. CO.; BARDON v. SAME
120 F. 1021·United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit·1902
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
ROYAL TRUST CO. et al. v. WASHBURN, B. & I. R. RY. CO. BARDON v. SAME.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.
October 7, 1902.)
No. 861.
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District of Wisconsin.
Richard Sleight, for appellant.
M. F. Gallagher, for appellees.
Before JENKINS, GROSSCUP, and BAKER, Circuit Judges.
Rehearing denied November 15, 1902.
[MAJORITY — GROSSCUP, Circuit Judge.]
GROSSCUP, Circuit Judge.
This case involved the claim of Bardon for vendor’s lien for rails sold to the railroad company, and is in every respect, so far as it was decided, identical with the case of John O’Brien Lumber Company, intervener, appellant, v. Royal Trust Company and Horace S. Oakley, trustees, A. C. Frost, receiver, et al. (No. 860, just decided) 120 Fed. 11. For reasons there given the decree of the Circuit Court will be affirmed.