General
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Joseph Elioff, Appellant
152 A.D.3d 115854 N.Y.S.3d 915·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·2017·NY
Present — Smith, J.P., Garni, NeMoyer, Curran and Troutman, JJ.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Fourth Department,
July, 2017
(July 7, 2017)
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Joseph Elioff, Appellant.
[54 NYS3d 915]
[MAJORITY]
Appeal from a judgment of the Onondaga County Court (Thomas J. Miller, J.), rendered March 21, 2014. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of rape in the first degree.
It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of rape in the first degree (Penal Law § 130.35 [3]). We agree with defendant that his waiver of the right to appeal is invalid because “ ‘the minimal inquiry made by County Court [during the plea proceeding] was insufficient to establish that the court engage [d] . . . defendant in an adequate colloquy to ensure that the waiver of the right to appeal was a knowing and voluntary choice’ ” (People v Williams, 136 AD3d 1280, 1281 [2016], lv denied 27 NY3d 1141 [2016], lv denied 29 NY3d 954 [2017]). Nevertheless, contrary to defendant’s contention, we conclude that the sentence is not unduly harsh and severe.
Present — Smith, J.P., Garni, NeMoyer, Curran and Troutman, JJ.