General
The East River Bank, Respondent, v. Samuel F. Butterworth, impleaded, etc., Appellants
51 N.Y. 637·New York Commission of Appeals·1872·NY
All concur in result.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The East River Bank, Respondent, v. Samuel F. Butterworth, impleaded, etc., Appellants.
(Argued May 16, 1872;
decided September term, 1872.)
In this case the court concurred in result, but did not concur with opinion.
W. W. Macfarland for the appellants.
E. E. Anderson for the respondent.
[MAJORITY — Earl, C.,]
Earl, C.,
reads for affirmance.
All concur in result.
Judgment affirmed.