Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
Roberts et al. v. Stell et al.
379 U.S. 933·Supreme Court of the United States·1964
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 512.
Roberts et al. v. Stell et al.
Charles J. Bloch for petitioners. Statements as amici curiae, in support of the petition, were filed by the Attorneys General for their respective States as follows: Richmond M. Flowers of Alabama, Bruce Bennett of Arkansas, Jack P. F. Gremillion of Louisiana, Joseph T. Patterson of Mississippi, Wade Bruton of North Carolina, Daniel R. McLeod of South Carolina, and Robert Y. Button of Virginia.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.