Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
The People of the State of New York ex rel. Samuel H. Graham, Appellant, v. Edwin F. Studwell et al., Composing The Town Board of the Town of Rye, et al., Respondents
179 N.Y. 520·New York Court of Appeals·1904·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The People of the State of New York ex rel. Samuel H. Graham, Appellant, v. Edwin F. Studwell et al., Composing The Town Board of the Town of Rye, et al., Respondents.
People ex rel. Graham v. Studwell, 91 App. Div. 469, affirmed.
(Argued May 31, 1904;
decided June 14, 1904.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered April 7,1904, which reversed an interlocutory order of Special Term overruling a demurrer to an alternative writ of mandamus and dismissed the proceeding.
Cliarles P. Coxales and Justus A. B. Coxales for appellant.
Herbert Peeves, George A. Slater and Alexander S. Rowland for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., O’Brien, Bartlett, Martin, Yann, Cullen and Werner, JJ.