Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
Joseph C. Drake, Respondent, v. The New York, Lackawanna and Western Railway Company, Appellant
151 N.Y. 648·New York Court of Appeals·1896·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Joseph C. Drake, Respondent, v. The New York, Lackawanna and Western Railway Company, Appellant.
Brake v. N. T.,L. & W. B. Go., 75 Hun, 422, affirmed.
(Submitted December 10, 1896;
decided December 24, 1896.)
Appeal from a judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered March 22, 1894, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict, and also from an order which affirmed an order denying a motion for a new trial.
Robert T. Turner for appellant.
Frederick Collin for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
All concur.