Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Contracts · MBE-tested
McBRIDE v. SMITH, COMMANDANT, UNITED STATES COAST GUARD
390 U.S. 411·Supreme Court of the United States·1968
Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
McBRIDE v. SMITH, COMMANDANT, UNITED STATES COAST GUARD.
No. 1105,
October Term, 1966.
Decided March 18, 1968.
Melvin L. Wulf and Marvin M. Karpatkin for petitioner.
Solicitor General Griswold for respondent.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The petition for rehearing is granted and the order of May 29, 1967, denying certiorari is vacated. The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted, the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit vacated and the case is remanded to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York for further consideration in light of Schneider v. Smith, ante, p. 17, in accordance with the suggestion of the Solicitor General and upon an independent examination of the entire record.
Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.