IP
BEACH v. INMAN et al.
78 F. 923·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1897
Before WAUBACE, BAOOMBE, and SHIPMAN, Circuit Judges.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
BEACH v. INMAN et al.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
February 1, 1897.)
Patents — Iwmn&bment—Paper-Box Machine.
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of New York.
Edmund Wetmore, for appellants.
John Dane, Jr., for appellee.
Before WAUBACE, BAOOMBE, and SHIPMAN, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PEE CURIAM.]
PEE CURIAM.
We agree with the judge who heard the motion in the circuit court that the grooved roller of defendant’s machine is substantially the upper clamping die of the patent, for the mechanical reasons set forth in the opinion below. That being so, defendant’s machine is an infringement, and the order of the circuit court (75 Fed. 840) is affirmed, with costs.