Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
Dan HOGAN et al., Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee
50 F.2d 1078·United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·1931
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Dan HOGAN et al., Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
No. 5991.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
July 14, 1931.
Before FOSTER, Circuit Judge, and HUTCHESON and SIBLEY, District Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
The petition for rehearing in the above numbered and entitled cause, 48 F.(2d) 516, is granted as to. Jerome Woods and denied as. to all other appellants.