General
Charles M. Wells, Respondent, v. William J. Howard and Teresa Howard, Appellants
139 A.D. 912·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1910·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Charles M. Wells, Respondent, v. William J. Howard and Teresa Howard, Appellants.
[MAJORITY]
The verdict was against the weight of the evidence and for that reason the judgment and order are reversed .and a new trial granted, on condition that the plaintiff pay-the costs of the trial and disbursements-tódáte, Woodward, Jenks, Burr and Carr, JJ., concurred; Thomas, J., dissented as to defendant William J. Howard.