Tax
GREEN et al. v. AMERICAN SODA-FOUNTAIN CO.
81 F. 1004·United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·1897
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
GREEN et al. v. AMERICAN SODA-FOUNTAIN CO.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
March 4, 1897.)
Axipeal frbm the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. Counsel for axipPllamte requested to have taxed, as part of the costs for printing, the Ml of Alfred M. Slocum Company for reprinting complainant's record: and under rale 23 this was disallowed, to which order counsel Cor appellants duly excepted.
Straw-bridge & Taylor, for appellants. Joshua Pusey, for appellee.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Under the circumstances of the case, which we do not think it necessary to state, as counsel have not differed respecting the facts, we are of opinion that the conclusion reached by the clerk of this court upon the contested question of costs is right, and accordingly his taxation of the costs is confirmed.