Torts · MBE-tested
Frank Pavlock, Respondent, v. G. H. Witherell, Inc., Defendant, and David Van Curen, Appellant
11 A.D.2d 1083·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1960·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Frank Pavlock, Respondent, v. G. H. Witherell, Inc., Defendant, and David Van Curen, Appellant.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs. (Appeal from judgment of Cattaraugus Trial Term for plaintiff in an automobile negligence action. The order denied a motion for a new trial.) Present — Bastow, J. P., Goldman, Halpern, MeClusky and Henry, JJ.