Criminal Law · MBE-tested
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Terrance Breazil, Appellant
120 A.D.2d 602·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1986·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Terrance Breazil, Appellant.
[MAJORITY]
— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Broomer, J.), rendered July 12, 1984, convicting him of robbery in the first degree (two counts), and robbery in the second degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Judgment affirmed.
There is no merit to the defendant’s right to counsel claim. Further, the alleged error in the court’s accomplice charge is unpreserved for appellate review, there having been no objection registered in respect thereto at trial (see, CPL 470.05; People v Nuccie, 57 NY2d 818). Finally, the sentence imposed was not unduly harsh or excessive under the circumstances of this case and in light of the defendant’s prior criminal involvement. Fiber, J. P., Kunzeman, Kooper and Spatt, JJ., concur.