Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
Washington National Building and Loan Association, Petitioner, v. Bertha L. Fiske and Husband
188 U.S. 740·Supreme Court of the United States·1903
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 549.
Washington National Building and Loan Association, Petitioner, v. Bertha L. Fiske and Husband.
January 26, 1903.
Mr. George E. Hamilton, Mr. M. J. Colbert, Mr. J. II. Ralston and Mr. F. Z. Siddons for the petitioner. Mr. Maurice D. Rosenberg, Mr. Alexa/nder Wolf and Mr. D. W. Baker for the respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Petition for a ivrit of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia denied.