Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
GEORGE VAN CAMP & SONS COMPANY, Appellant, v. AMERICAN CAN COMPANY and the Van Camp Packing Company, Inc,, Appellees
30 F.2d 1011·United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit·1929
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
GEORGE VAN CAMP & SONS COMPANY, Appellant, v. AMERICAN CAN COMPANY and the Van Camp Packing Company, Inc,, Appellees.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.
March 14, 1929.
No. 3948.
Solon J. Carter, of Indianapolis, Ind., for appellant.
Wm. H. Thompson, of Indianapolis, Ind., for appellees.
Before ALSCHULER, EYANS, and PAGE, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
After the oral argument of this cause, this court certified to the Supremo Court questions in accordance with the statute, which questions were answered by the Supreme Court in its opinion and judgment of January 2, 1929 (49 S. Ct. 112, 73 L. Ed.-). Those answers malqi necessary the reversal of the decree of the District Court and the remandment of this cause to that court for further proceedings in harmony with the answers to said questions.
Decree reversed, and cause remanded.