Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
Walker's Appeal
2 U.S. 1902 Dall. 190·Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·1792·PA
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Walker’s Appeal.
INGERSOLL moved for the confirmation of the decree of the Orphans’ Court of Northumberland, given the 26th March, 1792, from which (as it appeared by a certificate he produced) an appeal had been entered. But the Court, finding that there was no copy of the proceedings lodged with the prothonotary, refused to receive the motion : And by
[MAJORITY — Shippen, Justice:]
Shippen, Justice:
—The regular method of bringing up the record is by certiorari ; and nothing else can stay the proceedings below.