Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
The First National Bank of Paterson, New Jersey, Appellant, v. Seth M. Tuttle, Alleged Trustee, Impleaded, etc., Respondent
148 N.Y. 744·New York Court of Appeals·1896·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The First National Bank of Paterson, New Jersey, Appellant, v. Seth M. Tuttle, Alleged Trustee, Impleaded, etc., Respondent.
(Submitted January 20, 1896;
decided January 31, 1896.)
s Appeal from order of the General Term of the Superior Court of the city of New York, made December 23, 1895, which affirmed an order of Special Term directing, a bill of particulars.
Preston Stevenson for appellant.
Wells, Waldo dk SnedeJcer for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Appeal dismissed, with costs; no opinion.
All concur.