Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
Robert Gilland, Plaintiff in Error, v. The United States
223 U.S. 709·Supreme Court of the United States·1911
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 361.
Robert Gilland, Plaintiff in Error, v. The United States.
In error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District' of South Dakota.
Argued October 12, 1911.
Decided October 24, 1911.
Mr. Louis W. Crofoot for the plaintiff in error. The Attorney General and The Solicitor General for the defendant in error.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Judgment reversed, upon confession of error by counsel for the defendant in error, and cause remanded for further proceedings in conformity to law.