Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Barry Wayne ADAMS, Petitioner v. CALHOUN COUNTY, MICHIGAN, et al., 2020 — 140 S. Ct. 1246 · caselaw · US
Criminal Law · MBE-tested
Barry Wayne ADAMS, Petitioner v. CALHOUN COUNTY, MICHIGAN, et al.
140 S. Ct. 1246206 L. Ed. 2d 173·Supreme Court of the United States·2020
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Barry Wayne ADAMS, Petitioner
v.
CALHOUN COUNTY, MICHIGAN, et al.
No. 19-7200
Supreme Court of the United States.
February 24, 2020
Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petition in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals , 506 U.S. 1, 113 S.Ct. 397, 121 L.Ed.2d 305 (1992) (per curiam ).