Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
MORAN TOWING & TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, Libelant-Appellant, v. MOTOR SHIP INTERWATERWAYS NO. 103, Her Engines, etc.; Interwaterways Line, Inc., Claimant-Appellee
8 F.2d 1020·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1925
Before ROGERS, HOUGH, and MAN-TON, Circuit Judges.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
MORAN TOWING & TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, Libelant-Appellant, v. MOTOR SHIP INTERWATERWAYS NO. 103, Her Engines, etc.; Interwaterways Line, Inc., Claimant-Appellee.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
October 9, 1925.)
No. 32.
Appeal from tbe District Court of tbe United States for the Eastern District of New York.
Maeklin, Brown & Van Wyck, of New York City (Horace L. Cheyney, of New York City, of counsel), for appellant.
Barry, Wainwright, Thaeher & Symmers of New York City (John C. Prizer, of New York City, of counsel), for appellee.
Before ROGERS, HOUGH, and MAN-TON, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Decree affirmed in open court.