Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
William S. Marrin et al., Appellants, v. Owen A. Marrin, Respondent
92 N.Y. 644·New York Court of Appeals·1883·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
William S. Marrin et al., Appellants, v. Owen A. Marrin, Respondent.
(Argued April 17, 1883;
decided April 24, 1883.)
Mem. of decision below (27 Hun, 601).
Joseph J. Ma/rrim, for appellants.
Benjamin Ditchings for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to reverse orders of the Special and General Terms and to deny motion ; no opinion.
All concur.
Ordered accordingly.